Why are Battlefield players are so annoying with this mw3 crap?

RSS

Why are Battlefield players are so annoying with this mw3 crap?

Mon, Oct 17, 2011

Modern Warfare 3

Question by vilma: Why are Battlefield players are so annoying with this mw3 crap?
Seriously. Mw3 wi beat bf3. 60 fps, KillStreaks, perks, and let’s face it, it just feels better even with the new survival mOde.

Best answer:

Answer by Ninja-Ness チャンス
Yup, that explains why BF3 has WAY more Pre-orders then MW3,

Add your own answer in the comments!

Tags

5 Comments For This Post

  1. Jack Says:

    Sorry, all first person shooters are the same un-innovative genre of gaming that goes round and round in circles with the same story lines and the same gameplay.

  2. Jake Says:

    Its 60 fps because the graphics aren;t as good. The gameplay is purely opinion, but the other CODs had an arguably terrible balance and lack of new features. Will MW3 be better? We’ll just have to wait and find out!

  3. ninjajump Says:

    I getting both but this is my thoughts. BF3 is going to be play for 2-3 months and then everyone is going to drop it and crawl back to MW3. I find BF has always had a slow level and it slow paced like black ops it will be just like BFBC2 and peice of shit u play for a month and then u r back to COD.

  4. Big Daddy Says:

    Assassins creed will be better than both.

  5. Trevor Says:

    Now I don’t want to start anything, but as a player of both series(having played the last 5 CODs and owning the last 3) I can honestly say that after about 45 mins. of online, I was done with COD. I got many of my friends started on the game and they felt the same way. What does COD have that Battlefield doesn’t already do better(Beside kill streaks and don’t even get me started on those. My issue with kill streaks is that it basically operates as a kind of “rich get richer” kind of thing)? Battlefield has quad bikes, boats, jet skis, several different types of tanks, UAVs, different types of helicopters, etc., etc., etc., much more mature community, large maps that allow for sniping yet CQC(I admit that BFBC2 had a bit of a sniper problem that will most likely be fixed in BF3 but COD has more than enough issues so don’t start), a much more mature community(I’ve put 43 hrs. into multiplayer and I SWEAR I have not met a single squeaks kid, my friends seen one), DESTRUCTIBLE ENVIRONMENTS, and much more. Now I’ll be fair and admit that many of the CODs have been fun but basically it’s been the same game re-skinned in the past few installments. I and many other Battlefield players feel that COD lacks the strategy and depth of the Battlefield series. To answer your question, I think many Battlefield players are getting tired of fan boys over-rating and prasing COD and feel it’s time for Battlefield. Please don’t take this offensively, I just trying to lend a bit of insight. Thanks :)

    Edit: Let’s not forget the amazing new Frostbite 2.0 Engine :)

What do you think? Add your comment below.